Groomer World Order
During the Cold War America was seen as defending Christianity against godless communism. Whittaker Chambers described the Cold War as “a struggle between the force of two irreconcilable faiths—Communism and Christianity.” What faith is the American empire fighting for today?
On February 9th, 2022, the U.S. Department of Defense was busy telling the public that “Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Are Necessities in U.S. Military” and must be “a part of all decisions in the military”. Weeks later Russia invaded Ukraine.
“As a professor of political science at the U.S. Air Force Academy,” writes Lynne Chandler García in the Washington Post, “I teach critical race theories to our nation’s future military leaders”. This is the state of America’s military now, regardless of who is in power.
In Britain, Sky News reported that the RAF 'pauses job offers for white men' to meet diversity targets. Chief of the Defence Staff Tony Radakin referred to diversity as “probably the most important” priority for the defence department: “This is not about wokefulness. It is about woefulness. The woefulness of too few women. The woefulness of not reflecting the ethnic, religious and cognitive diversity of our nation.” While Britain barely has the industrial capacity to maintain its war-fighting capacity it will instead invest in conferences on “micro-aggressions”.
I grew up with a certain notion of the armed forces: apolitical and yet staunchly conservative. The long march through the institutions didn’t stop before it reached the military. That an organization long seem as synonymous with patriotism and patriarchy has now been fully captured by the extremes of political correctness shows the full-spectrum dominance of hyper-liberalism. NATO is overseen by diversity bureaucrats and gender advisors. The world police and the pronoun police are the same people.
In a training video from the US Navy, service members are taught to create a safe space by using preferred pronouns. As Curtis Yarvin pointed out : “In many ways, nonsense is a more effective organizing tool than the truth. Anyone can believe in the truth. To believe in nonsense is an unforgeable demonstration of loyalty. It serves as a political uniform.”
Announcing your pronouns isn’t just a way to express solidarity with transsexuals, it’s a way of signalling allegiance to the American regime. This isn’t the ideology of the far-left, it’s the ideology of every organ of the American state. To say “trans women are women” is to express fealty to the globalist American empire.
CBC News, the largest news broadcaster in Canada, recently reported that uniforms in the Canadian military will no longer be divided by gender: “Under the current Dress Instructions, only women are permitted to wear skirts and blouses as part of a uniform. The revisions allow men to wear these items as well.”
“As our society evolves,” says the Chief of the Canadian defence staff, “our military standards also change and evolve”.
Meanwhile, in Australia, scantily clad dancers twerked provocatively in front of a newly launched Navy vessel before assembled dignitaries. Going by the name of 101 Doll Squadron, the group were hired by the Royal Australian Navy to gyrate at the commissioning ceremony. Where there was once gravitas, or at least some vague sense of decorum, there is now only twerking.
All outposts of the American empire have turned into a thoroughly unserious clown show and yet the when it comes to foreign policy and rhetorical justifications for the use of force its still the same grandstanding moralistic bluster.
The “Rules Based Global Order”
General Milley worries that China and Russia “intend to change the current rules-based order”. Since the invasion of Ukraine the term has been a constant refrain among political leaders. What exactly are the rules? When Black Lives Matter and antifa were causing billions of pounds in property damage across the country, Trump advisor Stephen Miller stated the obvious during an Oval Office debate: "These cities are burning." According to Wall Street Journal reporter Michael Bender the comment infuriated Milley who spun around in his seat, pointed a finger at Miller and screeched "Shut the fuck up, Stephen.”
Burn it all down — those are the rules.
While America dropped bombs on Afghanistan so that women could wear miniskirts, get facial tattoos and pursue rap careers, the American military turned a blind eye to the sexual abuse of young boys by our professed allies. America and her allies set out to fundamentally change Afghan society, but not change it so much that they didn't rape kids.
In a democracy of rules-based child grooming we have to fight to defend our values so that children in Afghanistan and Ukraine can learn about the merits of Angela Davis.
It’s who we are.
In a piece titled Liberal Democracy is worth a fight in The Atlantic, historian Anne Applebaum writes, “In the real world, the battle to defend liberal democracy is sometimes a real battle, a military battle, not merely an ideological battle. It cannot always be fought with language, arguments, conferences, or diplomacy, or by deploying human-rights organizations, UN declarations, and fierce EU statements of concern.”
Defending liberal democracy may not sound like an terrible suggestion. The language is largely unchanged since the Cold War — were still fighting for freedom, for human rights, for democracy. The words are the same but their meaning has been redefined.
Jason Stanley, a Philosophy professor at Yale and author of the book How Fascism Works said of trans rights, “this is where the fight for global democracy is.” The deranged Twitter posts of a subpar philosopher might not seem of huge political relevance, but Stanley is a frequent collaborator with the Lincoln Project, a well-funded group of highly placed unrepentant neocon war-hawks.
Two people can be speaking the same language, and yet mean entirely different things. When you hear Jen Psaki or Samantha Power or Susan Rice say that we need to bomb a television station for “democracy” or bomb a Chinese embassy for “human rights”, simply replace those words with child drag queens and open borders.
The incomprehensible yet influential academic Judith Butler is responsible for pioneering radical gender ideology. She has likened TERF’s to the far-right: “The anti-gender ideology is one of the dominant strains of fascism in our time.” And how did we defeat fascism? By carpet-bombing civilians in Dresden and Hamburg and annihilating Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The (potentially nuclear) world wars of the future will be fought over trans rights in Taiwan and diversity in Donetsk.
How did we get here?
Stay tuned for part two!